A written or oral admission by the borrower that the debt exists. Under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a fresh acknowledgement before a court or in writing signed by the debtor extends the limitation period for filing a recovery suit by 3 years from the date of acknowledgement.
A letter from a borrower acknowledging outstanding dues and requesting a repayment schedule constitutes an acknowledgement of debt.
In practice, an acknowledgement of debt is the single most common way a time-barred or near-expiry claim is rescued. Under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a fresh acknowledgement in writing, signed by the debtor before the existing limitation period runs out, restarts the three-year clock from the date of acknowledgement. Creditors therefore treat borrower correspondence carefully: a letter admitting dues, a request for a repayment schedule, or a signed balance confirmation can each reset limitation and keep a recovery suit or DRT application alive. The timing is critical, the acknowledgement must precede expiry, not follow it; an admission made after limitation has already lapsed revives nothing. Borrowers and their counsel scrutinise dates and signatures for exactly this reason. Getting this wrong is fatal: a creditor who relies on a stale or post-expiry document may find the claim dismissed as barred. Well-advised creditors confirm the acknowledgement is dated, signed and in time before filing.
For specific advice on how Acknowledgement of Debt applies to your debt recovery matter, consult Advocate Subodh Bajpai — LLM, MBA (XLRI Jamshedpur). 8+ years of exclusive banking and debt recovery practice across DRT, SARFAESI, IBC, and NI Act.
Defined by Advocate Subodh Bajpai, Senior Partner, Unified Chambers and Associates